PROFESSIONAL CAREER:
Daniel has been a Senior Telecommunications Engineer since 1991 and Of Counsel for Industrial and Intellectual Property matters at BAYLOS since 2021.
He has worked for almost 20 years at the company TELEFONICA, where he took on executive, technical and management roles in IT / R&D&I / IP, and since 2006 he has taken on responsibilities in the TELEFONICA R&D Patent Office.
Daniel also has over 15 years of experience in Industrial and Intellectual Property matters and has worked at several of the leading Spanish IP agencies, including ISERN Patentes y Marcas and UNGRÍA Patentes y Marcas, performing executive, commercial management and business development roles, advising clients from multiple industry, telecommunications and software development sectors.
He lectures regularly in different courses related to telecommunications, network security, operating systems, industrial and intellectual property, innovation, as well as being responsible for organising training programmes in telecommunications and management skills at TELEFONICA I&D and the TELEFONICA Group.
Speaker at the Technical Conferences of the MADRID CHAMBER OF COMMERCE “Industrial and Intellectual Property: Essential values of the Company in its Internationalisation Process”.
EDUCATION:
Telecommunications Engineer (1991).
Postgraduate in Law and Intellectual Property Management - Centre for International Intellectual Property Studies, CEIPI (2014-2014).
PUBLICATIONS:
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) PATENTS. NEW PARADIGM BETWEEN HUMAN INVENTOR AND ARTIFICIAL INVENTOR.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is one of the innovative concepts involved in daily life in a world that is increasingly digital.
From the industrial and intellectual property perspective, AI has been considered by the WIPO (World Intellectual Property Office) as one of the first class study matters ...
METAVERSE & INDUSTRIAL AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 4.0 (METAVERSE & IP 4.0).
In the short and medium term, the rate of technological development surrounding the metaverse will be dizzying, which means that from a regulatory perspective, it would be wise not to waste time and create a new legal framework 4.0 for industrial and intellectual property.
